NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+7337%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
6
2560
Shading Units
48
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
