NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1638%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
