NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1569MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
8.033 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
26
2560
Shading Units
3328
160
TMUs
104
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
12 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
