Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P6000 +9844%
12.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Pascal
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1506 MHz
Base Clock
-
1645 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
6
3840
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

157.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
197.4 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
394.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
G94
GP102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy