NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1443MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 Mobile
1.478 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+835%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1177 MHz
Base Clock
-
1443 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
7680
32
TMUs
240
16
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
46.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
23.09 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1478 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
46.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
14 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
