Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1443MHz
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P620 Mobile +43%
1.478 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1177 MHz
Base Clock
-
1443 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
512
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
46.18 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
23.09 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1478 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
46.18 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy