NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (40W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
+65%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
