NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
+167%
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
