NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
+142%
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P620
+333%
130
Quadro K2000M
30
OctaneBench
Quadro P620
+108%
25
Quadro K2000M
12
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
