NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1354MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
+56%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
122W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
