NVIDIA Quadro Plex 7000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro Plex 7000 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 600W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro Plex 7000
1.176 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
+1169%
14.93 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Plex
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
72
512
Shading Units
4608
64
TMUs
288
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.37 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
36.74 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
1176 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
587.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
600W
TDP
260W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DVI
2x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
