CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID K500
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID K500
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
NVIDIA GRID K500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM GRID K500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+103%
4.666 TFLOPS
GRID K500
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
VS
GRID K500
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1920
Shading Units
1536
120
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090
2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060
3
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
4
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla T40 24 GB
6
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
7
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
8
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
9
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M40
10
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K100M
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy