Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +15989%
4.666 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
2
1920
Shading Units
16
120
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
21W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy