Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q and 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1215MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 245W)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
Tesla K40c +8%
5.046 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
745 MHz
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
876 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
2880
120
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
48
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.56 GPixel/s
145.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
210.2 GTexel/s
9.331 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.666 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.046 TFLOPS
145.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.682 TFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
245W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-890-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy