Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +8881%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
4
1920
Shading Units
32
120
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G84
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy