Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +131%
5.299 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
1536
120
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK104
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy