Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
1872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile +4806%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
6
1920
Shading Units
48
120
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT216
N19E-Q1-KA-K1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy