Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile +2350%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1110 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
192
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
320
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

99.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
249.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
15.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
249.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GK107
N19E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy