Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +1011%
9.492 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200M
0.854 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
3072
Shading Units
640
192
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.67 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.68 GTexel/s
18.98 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.492 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
853.8 GFLOPS
296.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.68 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU104B
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy