Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +2475%
10.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
16
3072
Shading Units
128
192
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

110W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
G92
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy