Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile +957%
10.87 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
384
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

113.3 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
339.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
21.75 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
339.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
GF110
N19E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy