NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 6000
16.31 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000
16.31 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro RTX 6000
+1%
13758
Quadro RTX 8000
13586
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro RTX 6000
6699
Quadro RTX 8000
+2%
6871
3DMark Speed Way
Quadro RTX 6000
3006
Quadro RTX 8000
+3%
3121
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
72
4608
Shading Units
4608
288
TMUs
288
96
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
576
72
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
TU102
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
