Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
4512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (154W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +6391%
14.93 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2018
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
12
4608
Shading Units
96
288
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
24
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
466.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
29.86 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.93 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
466.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
154W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G80
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy