NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla X2070

VS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla X2070

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2070 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages

Released 7 years and 1 months late

Boost Clock1620MHz

More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)

4160 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Tesla X2070 's Advantages

Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +1180%

14.93 TFLOPS

Tesla X2070

1.166 TFLOPS

Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

VS

Tesla X2070

Graphics Card

Aug 2018

Release Date

Jul 2011

Quadro

Generation

Tesla

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1230 MHz

Base Clock

-

1620 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

924 MHz

Memory

48GB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

384bit

Memory Bus

384bit

672.0GB/s

Bandwidth

177.4GB/s

Render Config

-

72

SM Count

14

4608

Shading Units

448

288

TMUs

56

96

ROPs

48

576

Tensor Cores

-

72

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

6 MB

L2 Cache

768 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

155.5 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

18.23 GPixel/s

466.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

36.46 GTexel/s

29.86 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

14.93 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1166 GFLOPS

466.6 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

582.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W

TDP

225W

600 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Processor

TU102

GPU Name

GF100

TU102-875-A1

GPU Variant

GF100-876-A3

Turing

Architecture

Fermi

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

40 nm

18.6 billion

Transistors

3.1 billion

754 mm²

Die Size

529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

2.0

6.6

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

2

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB

3

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

4

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

5

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

6

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

7

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded

8

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

9

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050

10

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU