NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada
We compared a Professional market GPU: 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 and a Desktop platform GPU: 48GB VRAM RTX TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (260W vs 800W)
NVIDIA RTX TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (2520MHz vs 1770MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
13824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 8000
16.31 TFLOPS
RTX TITAN Ada
+469%
92.9 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2018
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 40
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1152GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
72
SM Count
144
4608
Shading Units
18432
288
TMUs
576
96
ROPs
192
576
Tensor Cores
576
72
RT Cores
144
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
169.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
32.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
509.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
260W
TDP
800W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
AD102
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
