Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Max Q and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2100MHz vs 1350MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
18560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Max Q
2.419 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +6654%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

765 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
75.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
4.838 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.419 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy