Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 +29%
2.957 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1536
56
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117B
GPU Name
GK104
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy