NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+540%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
24
896
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
GT200B
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
