NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+2886%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Oct 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
896
Shading Units
32
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117B
GPU Name
G96
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
