Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 +807%
2.957 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1395 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
92.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
5.914 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.957 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
92.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117B
GPU Name
GK107
N19P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy