NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+206%
3.318 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
