Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Max Q +222%
3.318 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1200 MHz
Base Clock
-
1620 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1751 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.1GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

51.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
103.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
6.636 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.318 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
103.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy