Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA A10M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA A10M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1785MHz vs 1635MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
A10M +541%
23.44 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
56
1024
Shading Units
7168
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net