NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID A100A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1785MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
GRID A100A
+279%
13.89 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
108
1024
Shading Units
6912
64
TMUs
432
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
