NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 172W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+406%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000 SDI
0.722 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
120.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
11
1024
Shading Units
352
64
TMUs
44
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.29 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.57 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
722.3 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
361.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
172W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Turing
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
