NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+6096%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
