Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +1021%
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro K500M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy