NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1785MHz vs 1215MHz)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+27%
4.666 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3220
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+66%
5349
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro T2000 Mobile
1426
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+133%
3324
Graphics Card
May 2019
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1575 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
TU106
-
-
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
