Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 520 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon 520 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon 520 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 520 Mobile
0.659 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +464%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
May 2015
Mobility Radeon
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
2048
20
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
20.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
659.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
41.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Banks
GPU Name
Amethyst
Banks PRO (216-0568010)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.69 billion
Transistors
5 billion
56 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy