Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

AMD Radeon 680M vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
3.379 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +69%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2017
Navi II IGP
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
16GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR5
System Shared
Memory Bus
256bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy