Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock993MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (16W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce 920MX +958%
0.508 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2016
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
965 MHz
-
Boost Clock
993 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
256
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.83 GTexel/s
-
-
-
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
508.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
15.89 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
16W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
Unknown
85 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy