Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile +6235%
3.041 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
40
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy