Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

ATI Radeon E2400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
9688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile +68608%
32.98 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2023
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1335 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
76
40
Shading Units
9728
4
TMUs
304
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
189.8 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
515.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.98 TFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.98 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
515.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
80-150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV610
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.18 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
85 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy