Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock758MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680M +430%
2.038 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
719 MHz
-
Boost Clock
758 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1344
32
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.22 GPixel/s
19.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.90 GTexel/s
-
-
-
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.038 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
84.90 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV730
GPU Name
GK104
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.514 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy