Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro M2000

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 40W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM +160%
1.248 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Jul 2012
Embedded
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
-
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
480
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

40W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
Turks
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy