AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1485MHz vs 1219MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+143%
3.041 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2017
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1124 MHz
Base Clock
1350 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Lexa
GPU Name
TU116
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
