Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

AMD Radeon E9171 MCM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1335MHz vs 1219MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9171 MCM
1.248 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +228%
4.101 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2017
Release Date
Apr 2019
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1124 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1219 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
24
512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
39.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
1248 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
1248 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
78.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Lexa
GPU Name
TU116
Lexa MCM Pro
GPU Variant
-
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
103 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy