AMD Radeon E9260 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9260 MXM
2.15 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+14%
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Apr 2020
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1090 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
14
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
896
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
19.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
57.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
2.150 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
134.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Baffin
GPU Name
TU117
Baffin PRO
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Turing
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
