AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1266MHz vs 1125MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max Q
+186%
16.7 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
Embedded
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1120 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
36
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
58
2304
Shading Units
7424
144
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
261.0 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
16.70 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.70 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
261.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ellesmere
GPU Name
GA103S
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
GN20-E8-A1
GCN 4.0
Architecture
Ampere
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
232 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
