Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R9 M365X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M365X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (1266MHz vs 925MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +392%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M365X
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
May 2015
Embedded
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
640
144
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Tropo
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy